> On 29 Jun 2022, at 11:44, Jelte Fennema <postg...@jeltef.nl> wrote: > >> See upthread in ef5c7896-20cb-843f-e91e-0ee5f7fd9...@enterprisedb.com > > I saw that section, but I thought that only applied before you > backpatched the actual fixes to PG13 and below. I mean there's no > reason anymore not to compile those older versions with OpenSSL 3.0, > right? If so, it seems confusing for the build to spit out warnings > that indicate the contrary.
The project isn't automatically fixing compiler warnings or library deprecation warnings in back-branches. I guess one could make the argument for this case given how widespread OpenSSL 3.0, but it comes with a significant testing effort to ensure that all back-branches behave correctly with all version of OpenSSL so it's not for free (it should be, but with OpenSSL I would personally not trust that). Also, PG12 and below had 0.9.8 as minimum version. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
