(please don't top-post. Surely you've been around this community long enough to know that)
On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 1:59 AM Hannu Krosing <han...@google.com> wrote: > My understanding was that unless activated by admin these changes > would change nothing. > That is assuming you can do this with changing just a couple of lines of code. Which you will not be able to do. The risk of back patching something like that even if off by default is *way* too large. And they would be (borderline :) ) security fixes > No, they would not. Not anymore than adding a new authentication method for example could be considered a security fix. And the versioning policy link actually does not say anything about > not adding features to older versions (I know this is the policy, just > pointing out the info in not on that page). > Yes it does: The PostgreSQL Global Development Group releases a new major version containing new features about once a year. Each major version receives bug fixes and, if need be, security fixes that are released at least once every three months in what we call a "minor release." And slightly further down: While upgrading will always contain some level of risk, PostgreSQL minor releases fix only frequently-encountered bugs, security issues, and data corruption problems to reduce the risk associated with upgrading. So unless you claim this is a frequently encountered bug (it's not -- it's acting exactly has intentional), security issue (same) or data corruption (unrelated), it should not go in a minor version. It's very clear. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>