> On 21 Jun 2022, at 16:59, Jakub Wartak <jakub.war...@tomtom.com> wrote: Oh, wow, your benchmarks show really impressive improvement. > I think that 1 additional syscall is not going to be cheap just for > non-standard OS configurations Also we can reduce number of syscalls by something like #if defined(USE_POSIX_FADVISE) && defined(POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED) if ((readOff % (8 * XLOG_BLCKSZ)) == 0) posix_fadvise(readFile, readOff + XLOG_BLCKSZ, XLOG_BLCKSZ * 8, POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED); #endif and maybe define\reuse the some GUC to control number of prefetched pages at once. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
- Use fadvise in wal replay Kirill Reshke
- Re: Use fadvise in wal replay Amit Kapila
- Re: Use fadvise in wal replay Andrey Borodin
- RE: Use fadvise in wal replay Jakub Wartak
- Re: Use fadvise in wal replay Andrey Borodin
- RE: Use fadvise in wal replay Jakub Wartak
- Re: Use fadvise in wal replay Thomas Munro
- Re: Use fadvise in wal rep... Bharath Rupireddy
- RE: Use fadvise in wal rep... Jakub Wartak
- Re: Use fadvise in wal rep... Andrey Borodin
- Re: Use fadvise in wal rep... Pavel Borisov
- Re: Use fadvise in wal rep... Andrey Borodin
- Re: Use fadvise in wal rep... Pavel Borisov
- Re: Use fadvise in wal rep... Andrey Borodin
- RE: Use fadvise in wal rep... Jakub Wartak
- Re: Use fadvise in wal rep... Andrey Borodin
- RE: Use fadvise in wal rep... Jakub Wartak
- Re: Use fadvise in wal rep... Justin Pryzby
- Re: Use fadvise in wal rep... Robert Haas
- Re: Use fadvise in wal rep... Andrey Borodin