On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:51 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > We have this problem of long file names being silently truncated all > over the source code. Instead of equipping each one of them with a > length check, why don't we get rid of the fixed-size buffers and > allocate dynamically, as in the attached patch.
I've always wondered why we rely on MAXPGPATH instead of dynamic allocation. It seems pretty lame. I don't know how much we gain by fixing one place and not all the others, but maybe it would set a trend. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
