On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 6:23 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well I can report that the system from ec483147 was hellishly > complicated, and not universally loved. Which isn't to say that there > isn't a simple and loveable way to do it, waiting to be discovered, > and I do think we could fix most of the problems with that work.
I admit that I don't have much idea of how difficult it would be to make it all work. I'm definitely not claiming that it's easy. > I understand that that's not ideal from an > end-user perspective, but maybe it's more realistically and robustly > and simply implementable. Hmm. That may be a decisive reason to go with your proposal. I really don't know. -- Peter Geoghegan
