On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 7:53 PM Jacob Champion <jchamp...@timescale.com> wrote: > But I don't have any better ideas for how to achieve both. I'm fine > with your suggestion of ClientConnectionInfo, if that sounds good to > others; the doc comment can clarify why it differs from Port? Or add > one of the Shared-/Gang-/Group- prefixes to it, maybe?
I don't like the prefixes, so I'd prefer explaining it in the struct comment. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
