Hi, On 2022-06-01 06:55:06 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 06.05.22 23:27, Andres Freund wrote: > > I added pkgconfig since then. They're not exactly the same, but pretty > > close, > > except for one thing: Looks like some of the ecpg libraries really should > > link > > to some other ecpg libs? I think we're missing something there... That then > > leads to missing requirements in the .pc files. > > I took a closer look at the generated pkgconfig files. I think they are ok. > There are a couple of insignificant textual differences that we could reduce > by patching Makefile.shlib. But technically they are ok.
Thanks for checking! > There is one significant difference: the ecpg libraries now get a > Requires.private for openssl, which I think is technically correct since > both libpgcommon and libpgport require openssl. Yea, I noticed those too. It's not great, somehow. But I don't really see a better alternative for now. > Attached is a tiny patch to make the description in one file backward > consistent. Applied. Greetings, Andres Freund
