On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 03:30:28PM +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote: > Currently, lo_creat(e), lo_import, lo_unlink, lowrite, lo_put, > and lo_from_bytea are allowed even in read-only transactions. > By using them, pg_largeobject and pg_largeobject_metatable can > be modified in read-only transactions and the effect remains > after the transaction finished. Is it unacceptable behaviours, > isn't it?
Well, there is an actual risk to break applications that have worked until now for a behavior that has existed for years with zero complaints on the matter, so I would leave that alone. Saying that, I don't really disagree with improving the error messages a bit if we are in recovery. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
