On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 04:16:40PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > I think we should drop everything older than Win 10 for PG16, as > argued in various threads where various pain points came up. For one > thing, that would make a lot of future work simpler (ie not needing to > test alternative code paths on dead computers without CI or BF, AKA > dead code), and also I don't think we really help anyone by allowing > new database deployments on operating systems that aren't receiving > vendor patches on the world's most attacked operating system. Doing > it incrementally is fine by me, too, though, if it makes the patches > and discussions easier...
Is there anything posted recently that would require that? Perhaps the async work? FWIW, I agree to be much more aggressive, but there is nothing in the tree now that depends on _WIN32_WINNT, except one change for the locales. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
