On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 6:58 PM John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 8:52 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Overall, radix tree implementations have good numbers. Once we got an > > agreement on moving in this direction, I'll start a new thread for > > that and move the implementation further; there are many things to do > > and discuss: deletion, API design, SIMD support, more tests etc. > > +1 >
Thanks! I've attached an updated version patch. It is still WIP but I've implemented deletion and improved test cases and comments. > (FWIW, I think the current thread is still fine.) Okay, agreed. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
radixtree_wip_v2.patch
Description: Binary data
