On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 06:13:28PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > Or maybe we could mention that but use a wording that doesn't make it > sound like an implementation detail, like: > > +Previously, an ordered partition scan could not be used for a > LIST-partitioned table with any partition containing multiple values, > nor for partitioned tables with DEFAULT partition. Now it can be used > in those cases at least for queries in which such partitions are > pruned.
Sorry, I just don't see this as an improvement because it starts with a complex term "an ordered partition scan" rather than simply "a partitioned table". -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
