On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:20 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > Btw, shouldn't we have something a bit more, err, extensible for the > design of an extensible varlena header? If we keep it down to some > bitwise information, we'd be fine for a long time but it would be > annoying to review again an extended design if we need to extend it > with more data.
What do you have in mind? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
