On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 5:11 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> This adds additional variants of palloc, pg_malloc, etc. that
> encapsulate common usage patterns and provide more type safety.
>
> Examples:
>
> - result = (IndexBuildResult *) palloc(sizeof(IndexBuildResult));
> + result = palloc_obj(IndexBuildResult);
>
> - collector->tuples = (IndexTuple *) palloc(sizeof(IndexTuple) *
> collector->lentuples);
> + collector->tuples = palloc_array(IndexTuple, collector->lentuples);
>
> One common point is that the new interfaces all have a return type that
> automatically matches what they are allocating, so you don't need any
> casts nor have to manually make sure the size matches the expected
> result. Besides the additional safety, the notation is also more
> compact, as you can see above.
>
> Inspired by the talloc library.
>
> The interesting changes are in fe_memutils.h and palloc.h. The rest of
> the patch is just randomly sprinkled examples to test/validate the new
> additions.
It seems interesting. Are we always type-casting explicitly the output
of palloc/palloc0? Does this mean the compiler takes care of
type-casting the returned void * to the target type?
I see lots of instances where there's no explicit type-casting to the
target variable type -
retval = palloc(sizeof(GISTENTRY));
Interval *p = palloc(sizeof(Interval));
macaddr *v = palloc0(sizeof(macaddr)); and so on.
Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
