On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 3:24 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think you can get rid of SYNC_UNLINK_REQUEST, sync_unlinkfiletag, > mdunlinkfiletag as these are all now unused.
Correct. > Are there any special hazards here if the plan in [1] goes ahead? IMHO we should not have any problem. In fact, we need this for [1] right? Otherwise, there is a risk of reusing the same relfilenode within the same checkpoint cycle as discussed in [2]. > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BTgmoYmw%3D%3DTOJ6EzYb_vcjyS09NkzrVKSyBKUUyo1zBEaJASA%40mail.gmail.com [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZZDL_2E_zuahqpJ-WmkuxmUi8+g7=dLEny=18r-+c...@mail.gmail.com -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com