On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 8:47 AM Simon Riggs <simon.ri...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Note that I'm *not* against making checkpoint extensible - I just think it > > needs a good bit of design work around when the hook is called etc. > > When was any such work done previously for any other hook?? That isn't needed.
I think almost every proposal to add a hook results in some discussion about how usable the hook will be and whether it's being put in the correct place and called with the correct arguments. I think that's a good thing, too. Otherwise the code would be cluttered with a bunch of hooks that seemed to someone like a good idea at the time but are actually just a maintenance headache. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
