Hi Justin, On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:58 AM Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 11:37:35AM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > > - If multiple foreign servers with this option enabled are involved in > > - a local (sub)transaction, multiple remote (sub)transactions opened > > on > > - those foreign servers in the local (sub)transaction are committed in > > - parallel across those foreign servers when the local > > (sub)transaction > > - commits. > > + If multiple foreign servers with this option enabled have a local > > + transaction, multiple remote transactions on those foreign servers > > are > > + committed in parallel across those foreign servers when the local > > + transaction is committed. > > </para> > > I think "have a transaction" doesn't sound good, and the old language > "involved > in" was better.
I think so too. Thanks! Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
