On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 12:42 PM wangw.f...@fujitsu.com
<wangw.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 9:54 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 7:18 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 8:07 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 11:32 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So, shall we go back to the previous approach of using a separate
> > > > > function update_replication_progress?
> > > >
> > > > Ok, agreed.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Attached, please find the updated patch accordingly. Currently, I have
> > > prepared it for HEAD, if you don't see any problem with this, we can
> > > prepare the back-branch patches based on this.
> >
> > Thank you for updating the patch. Looks good to me.
> Thanks for your review.
>
> Improve the back-branch patches according to the discussion.
>

Thanks. The patch LGTM. I'll push and back-patch this after the
current minor release is done unless there are more comments related
to this work.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.


Reply via email to