Hi, On 2022-05-05 23:36:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > On 2022-05-05 22:07:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> May I ask where we're at on this? Next week's back-branch release is > >> getting uncomfortably close, and I'm still seeing various buildfarm > >> animals erratically failing on 031_recovery_conflict.pl. > > > Looks like the problems are gone on HEAD at least. > > It does look that way, although the number of successes is not large yet. > > >> Should we just remove that test from the back branches for now? > > > That might be the best course, marking the test as TODO perhaps? > > I poked closer and saw that you reverted 5136967f1 et al because > (I suppose) adjust_conf is not there in the back branches.
Yea. That one was a stupid mistake, working outside my usual environment. It's easy enough to work around adjust_conf not existing (just appending works), but then there's subsequent test failures... > So I reluctantly vote for removing 031_recovery_conflict.pl in the > back branches for now, with the expectation that we'll fix the > infrastructure and put it back after the current release round > is done. What about instead marking the flapping test TODO? That'd still give us most of the coverage... Greetings, Andres Freund
