Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes:
> čt 28. 4. 2022 v 23:52 odesílatel Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
>> Perhaps the OPEN change is a little too aggressive, since if
>> you give the refcursor variable some non-null initial value,
>> OPEN won't change it; in that usage a CONSTANT marking could
>> be allowed. But I really seriously doubt that anybody out
>> there is marking such variables as constants, so I thought
>> throwing the error at compile time was better than postponing
>> it to runtime so we could handle that.
>>
>> Regardless of which way we handle that point, I'm inclined to
>> change this only in HEAD. Probably people wouldn't thank us
>> for making the back branches more strict.
> +1
After sleeping on it, I got cold feet about breaking arguably
legal code, so I made OPEN check at runtime instead. Which
was probably a good thing anyway, because it made me notice
that exec_stmt_forc() needed a check too. AFAICS there are no
other places in pl_exec.c that are performing assignments to
variables not checked at parse time.
Pushed that way.
regards, tom lane
