On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 13:47 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> I found an easy way to reproduce this consistently (I think on any
> server):
>
> I basically generated huge WAL record (I used a fun extension that I
> wrote - https://github.com/BRupireddy/pg_synthesize_wal, but one can
> use pg_logical_emit_message as well)
Thank you Bharath for creating the extension and the simple test case.
Thomas's patch solves the issue for me as well.
Tom, the debug patch you posted[0] seems to be setting the error
message if it's not already set. Thomas's patch uses the lack of a
message as a signal that we've reached the end of WAL. That explains
why you are still seeing the problem.
Obviously, that's a sign that Thomas's patch is not the cleanest
solution. But other approaches would be more invasive. I guess the
question is whether that's a good enough solution for now, and
hopefully we could improve the API later; or whether we need to come up
with something better.
When reviewing, I considered the inability to read old WAL and the
inability to read flushed-in-the-middle-of-a-record WAL as similar
kinds of errors that the user would need to deal with. But they are
different: the former can be avoided by creating a slot; the latter
can't be easily avoided, only retried.
Depending on the intended use cases, forcing the user to retry might be
reasonable, in which case we could consider this a test problem rather
than a real problem, and we might be able to do something simpler to
just stabilize the test.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
[0] https://postgr.es/m/295868.1651024...@sss.pgh.pa.us
