Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:36:10PM +0800, Rui Zhao wrote:
>> Do you have interest in adding a test like one in my patch?
> I have studied the test case you are proposing, and I am afraid that
> it is too expensive as designed.
That was my feeling too. It's certainly a useful test for verifying
that we fixed the problem, but that doesn't mean that it's worth the
cycles to add it as a permanent fixture in check-world, even if we
could get rid of the timing assumptions.
regards, tom lane
