On 2022-Apr-18, Tom Lane wrote: > I suppose that Peter was trying to remove special cases from the > outfuncs.c code, but do we want to put this one back? Richard's > proposal would not accurately reflect the contents of the data > structure, so I'm not too thrilled with it.
Yeah -- looking at the script to generate node support functions[1], it might be better go back to the original formulation (i.e., your proposed patch), and then use a "path_hack4" for this struct member, which looks similar to other hacks already there for other cases that require bespoke handling. [1] https://postgr.es/m/bee9fdb0-cd10-5fdb-3027-c4b5a240b...@enterprisedb.com -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
