On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 11:03 PM Euler Taveira <eu...@eulerto.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022, at 7:40 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > > Regarding the new examples (for partitioned tables), shouldn't we move the > parent / child definitions to the beginning of the Examples section? >
I think that will make examples less clear. > It seems > confusing use the same code snippet to show repeated table definitions > (publisher and subscriber). I checked fast and after a few seconds I realized > that the example is not wrong but the database name has a small difference > (one > letter "s" x "p"). > Can you be more specific? AFAICS, dbname used (testpub) is same. > The publication and subscription definitions are fine there. > > I think reusing the same tables and publication introduces complexity. > Shouldn't we just use different tables and publication to provide an "easy" > example? It would avoid DROP PUBLICATION, ALTER SUBSCRIPTION and TRUNCATE. > I don't know. I find the current way understandable. I feel using different names won't gain much and make the example difficult to follow. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
