On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 10:31:17AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Christoph Berg <m...@debian.org> writes: > > > I would think that if \dconfig showed the non-default settings only, > > it would be much more useful; the full list would still be available > > with "\dconfig *". This is in line with \dt only showing tables on the > > search_path, and "\dt *.*" showing all. > > Hm, I could get on board with that -- any other opinions?
+1 for it, that's often what I'm interested in when looking at the GUCs in general. > (Perhaps there's an argument for omitting "override" > settings as well?) -0.1. Most are usually not useful, but I can see at least data_checksums and wal_buffers that are still interesting.
