> I object. And I'm negatively surprised that this is even considered. >
I am also a bit surprised.. > This is a complicated patch that has been heavily reworked in the last > few days to, among other things, address objections that have first been > made months ago ([1]). There we nontrivial bugs less than a day ago. It > has not received a lot of reviews since these changes. This isn't an > area you've previously been involved in to a significant degree. > I thought all the points that you had raised in [1] had been met with satisfactorily. Let me know if that's not the case. The last few days, the focus was on making the decodegroup locking implementation a bit more robust. Anyways, will now wait for the next commitfest/opportunity to try to get this in. > > [1] > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20180209211025.d7jxh43fhqnevhji%40alap3.anarazel.de Regards, Nikhils -- Nikhil Sontakke http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL/Postgres-XL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
