On 4/7/22 17:58, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2022-04-07 17:45:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >>> On 2022-04-07 17:21:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> I too think that the elapsed time is useful. I'm less convinced >>>> that the time-of-day marker is useful. >>> I think it'd be quite useful if it had more precision - it's a pita to >>> correlate regress_log_* output with server logs. >> Fair point. Maybe we could keep the timestamp (with ms precision >> if possible) and then the parenthetical bit is time-since-last-line >> (also with ms precision)? I think that would more or less satisfy >> both uses. > Would work for me... >
All doable. Time::HiRes gives us a higher resolution timer. I'll post a new version in a day or two. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com