On 06.04.22 11:12, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
We could also move forward with this patch independently of the other one.  If we end up reverting the other one, then this one won't be very useful but it won't really hurt anything and it would presumably become useful eventually.  What we presumably don't want is that the sequence replication patch gets repaired for PG15 and we didn't end up committing this patch because of uncertainty.

I have received some encouragement off-list to go ahead with this, so it's been committed.



Reply via email to