On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 10:40:04AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 1:31 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes. In normal circumstances it shouldn't need a lot of time to do that,
> > but
> > I'm not so sure with e.g. network filesystems. I'm not strongly in favor of
> > counting it, especially since smgrextend doesn't either.
>
> Good point. I think that adding a new place to track I/O timing can be
> a separate patch so probably we can work on it for PG16 or later.
Agreed.
> I've attached updated patches, please review it.
It looks good to me, just one minor thing in 002:
@@ -183,8 +184,10 @@ typedef struct Counters
int64 local_blks_written; /* # of local disk blocks written */
int64 temp_blks_read; /* # of temp blocks read */
int64 temp_blks_written; /* # of temp blocks written */
- double blk_read_time; /* time spent reading, in msec */
- double blk_write_time; /* time spent writing, in msec */
+ double blk_read_time; /* time spent reading blocks, in msec */
+ double blk_write_time; /* time spent writing blocks, in msec */
+ double temp_blk_read_time; /* time spent reading temp
blocks, in msec */
+ double temp_blk_write_time; /* time spent writing temp blocks,
in msec */
maybe the comments should respectively be data file blocks and temp file
blocks.
This is a minor detail and the rest of the patch looks good to me, so I'm
marking the patch as Ready for Committer!
