On 4/4/22 17:26, Tom Lane wrote: > Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> [ v15 patch ] > Thanks. As I'm working through this, I'm kind of inclined to drop > the has_parameter_privilege() variants that take an OID as object > identifier. This gets back to the fact that I don't think > pg_parameter_acl OIDs have any outside use; we wouldn't even have > them except that we need a way to track their role dependencies > in pg_shdepend. AFAICS users will only ever be interested in > looking up a GUC by name. Any objections?
Not from me cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
