> On Apr 4, 2022, at 9:27 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > > I'd really like it if amcheck had HOT chain verification. That's the > other area where catching bugs passively with assertions and whatnot > is clearly not good enough. I agree, and was hoping to get around to this in the postgres 15 development cycle. Alas, that did not happen. Worse, I have several other projects that will keep me busy for the next few months, at least. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
- Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 027_stream_regress... Andres Freund
- Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 027_strea... Peter Geoghegan
- Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 027_s... Robert Haas
- Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 0... Peter Geoghegan
- Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl a... Mark Dilger
- Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 0... Andres Freund
- Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl a... Robert Haas
- Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 027_s... Andrew Dunstan
- Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 027_strea... Michael Paquier
- Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 027_s... Andres Freund
- Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 0... Michael Paquier