Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > [ v5-0001-Replace-BASE_BACKUP-COMPRESSION_LEVEL-option-with.patch ]
Coverity has a nitpick about this: /srv/coverity/git/pgsql-git/postgresql/src/common/backup_compression.c: 194 in parse_bc_specification() 193 /* Advance to next entry and loop around. */ >>> CID 1503251: Null pointer dereferences (REVERSE_INULL) >>> Null-checking "vend" suggests that it may be null, but it has already >>> been dereferenced on all paths leading to the check. 194 specification = vend == NULL ? kwend + 1 : vend + 1; 195 } 196 } Not sure if you should remove this null-check or add some other ones, but I think you ought to do one or the other. regards, tom lane