Tom Lane wrote: > I've always felt that the pg_foo_fn.h business was a kluge, and would > be happy to get rid of it. But one could also argue that it would be > a good design, if we adopted it uniformly instead of haphazardly. > But that'd require more code churn, and there's no longer a lot to be > gained thereby.
I vote for removing pg_foo_fn.h. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
