Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> Looks good wrt relptr_store. Maybe we should fix the double-eval hazard in
> relptr_access too, think that'd be only one left over...

Hm.  Probably not worth the trouble, because it's hard to envision
a situation where rp is not a plain lvalue.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to