Hi, I've fixed most of the reported issues (or at least I think so), with the exception of those in apply_handle_sequence function, i.e.:
1) properly coordinating with the tablesync worker 2) considering skip_lsn, skipping changes 3) missing privilege check, similar to TargetPrivilegesCheck 4) nicer error message if the sequence does not exist The apply_handle_sequence stuff seems to be inter-related, so I plan to deal with that in a single separate commit - the main part being the tablesync coordination, per the fix I shared earlier today. But I need time to think about that, I don't want to rush that. Thanks for the feedback! -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
