On 7 April 2018 at 15:41, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I'm also wondering how come we had hash partitioning before and > did not have this sort of problem. Is it just that we added a > new test that's more sensitive to the details of the hashing > (if so, could it be made less so)? Or is there actually more > platform dependence now than before (and if so, why is that)?
We didn't prune HASH partitions before today. They were just all returned. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
