Hi, On 2022-03-23 15:58:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > I think we should backpatch both, based on the reasoning in > > 46ab07ffda9d6c8e63360ded2d4568aa160a7700 ? > > Yeah, I suppose. Is anyone going to step up and run a buildfarm > member with ubsan enabled? (I'm already checking -fsanitize=alignment > on longfin, but it seems advisable to keep that separate from > -fsanitize=undefined.)
I'm planning to enable it on two of mine. Looks like gcc and clang find slightly different things, so I was intending to enable it on one of each. Greetings, Andres Freund
