On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 3:05 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > After review, I don't like much the idea of allowing concurrent > autovacuums to run in parallel of the table(s) of this test, so we'd > better disable it explicitely.
Make sense. > "t1" is also a very generic name to use in a regression test. Agreed! > Another thing that itched me is that we > could also test more with indexes, particularly with btree, BRIN and > hash (the latter should not have a FSM with 10 pages as per the first > group batch, and each one has a stable an initial state). What about GIN/GIST indexes? > I have extended the set of tests as of the attached, running these > across everything I could (CI, all my hosts including Windows, macos, > Linux). We could do more later, of course, but this looks enough to > me as a first step. And I think that this will not upset the > buildfarm. Also LGTM. Regards, -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello
