On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 3:01 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > We clearly already know how to compute whether a lock is "included" in > something we already hold - after all ProcSleep() successfully does so. > > Isn't it a pretty trivial test? Seems like it'd boil down to something like
I don't mind you fixing the behavior. I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to complain about the structure of lock.c. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
