> On 22. 3. 2022, at 13:09, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 4:25 AM Tomas Vondra > <tomas.von...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Attached is a rebased patch, addressing most of the remaining issues. >> > > It appears that on the apply side, the patch always creates a new > relfilenode irrespective of whether the sequence message is > transactional or not. Is it required to create a new relfilenode for > non-transactional messages? If not that could be costly? >
That's a good catch, I think we should just write the page in the non-transactional case, no need to mess with relnodes. Petr