В Вт, 15/03/2022 в 13:47 +0300, Yura Sokolov пишет: > В Вт, 15/03/2022 в 16:25 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi пишет: > > > I lost access to Xeon 8354H, so returned to old Xeon X5675. > > ... > > > Strange thing: both master and patched version has higher > > > peak tps at X5676 at medium connections (17 or 27 clients) > > > than in first october version [1]. But lower tps at higher > > > connections number (>= 191 clients). > > > I'll try to bisect on master this unfortunate change. > > > > The reversing of the preference order between freshly-allocation and > > borrow-from-another-freelist might affect. > > `master` changed its behaviour as well. > It is not problem of the patch at all.
Looks like there is no issue: old commmit 2d44dee0281a1abf behaves similar to new one at the moment. I think, something changed in environment. I remember there were maintanance downtime in the autumn. Perhaps kernel were updated or some sysctl tuning changed. ---- regards Yura.
