On 3/2/22 11:10, Dean Rasheed wrote:
For my part, I find myself more and more convinced that
"security_invoker" is the right name, because it matches the
terminology used for functions, and in other database systems. I think
the parallels between security invoker functions and security invoker
views are quite strong.

[..]

What are other people's opinions?


Since there don't seem to be any more objections to "security_invoker" I attached v10 renaming it again.

I've tried to better clarify the whole invoker vs. definer thing in the CREATE VIEW documentation by explicitly mentioning that "security_invoker=false" is _not_ the same as "security definer", based on the earlier discussions.

This should hopefully avoid any implicit associations.

Thanks,
Christoph
From 89efb198694f7ff6e05068662a72a0bdcb43e13d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Heiss <christoph.he...@cybertec.at>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 17:54:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v10 1/1] Add new boolean reloption "security_invoker" to views

When this reloption is set to "true", all permissions on the underlying
relations will be checked against the invoking user rather than the view
owner.  The latter remains the default behavior.

Author: Christoph Heiss <christoph.he...@cybertec.at>
Co-Author: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-By: Laurenz Albe, Wolfgang Walther
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b66dd6d6-ad3e-c6f2-8b90-47be773da240%40cybertec.at
Signed-off-by: Christoph Heiss <christoph.he...@cybertec.at>
---
 doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_view.sgml              | 13 ++-
 doc/src/sgml/ref/create_view.sgml             | 76 +++++++++++++++---
 src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c        | 11 +++
 src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c          | 18 +++--
 src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c            | 79 ++++++++++++-------
 src/include/utils/rel.h                       | 11 +++
 src/test/regress/expected/create_view.out     | 73 ++++++++++++++---
 src/test/regress/expected/rowsecurity.out     | 43 +++++++++-
 src/test/regress/expected/rules.out           | 20 +++++
 src/test/regress/expected/updatable_views.out | 28 +++++++
 src/test/regress/sql/create_view.sql          | 44 ++++++++++-
 src/test/regress/sql/rowsecurity.sql          | 26 ++++++
 src/test/regress/sql/rules.sql                | 23 ++++++
 src/test/regress/sql/updatable_views.sql      | 27 +++++++
 14 files changed, 430 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_view.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_view.sgml
index 98c312c5bf..f6bb084117 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_view.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_view.sgml
@@ -156,11 +156,22 @@ ALTER VIEW [ IF EXISTS ] <replaceable class="parameter">name</replaceable> RESET
         <listitem>
          <para>
           Changes the security-barrier property of the view.  The value must
-          be Boolean value, such as <literal>true</literal>
+          be a Boolean value, such as <literal>true</literal>
           or <literal>false</literal>.
          </para>
         </listitem>
        </varlistentry>
+       <varlistentry>
+        <term><literal>security_invoker</literal> (<type>boolean</type>)</term>
+        <listitem>
+         <para>
+          Changes whether permission checks on the underlying relations are
+          performed as the view owner or as the invoking user.  Default is
+          <literal>false</literal>.  The value must be a Boolean value, such as
+          <literal>true</literal> or <literal>false</literal>.
+         </para>
+        </listitem>
+       </varlistentry>
       </variablelist></para>
     </listitem>
    </varlistentry>
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_view.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_view.sgml
index bf03287592..1f55379f73 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_view.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_view.sgml
@@ -137,8 +137,6 @@ CREATE VIEW [ <replaceable>schema</replaceable> . ] <replaceable>view_name</repl
           This parameter may be either <literal>local</literal> or
           <literal>cascaded</literal>, and is equivalent to specifying
           <literal>WITH [ CASCADED | LOCAL ] CHECK OPTION</literal> (see below).
-          This option can be changed on existing views using <link
-          linkend="sql-alterview"><command>ALTER VIEW</command></link>.
          </para>
         </listitem>
        </varlistentry>
@@ -152,7 +150,23 @@ CREATE VIEW [ <replaceable>schema</replaceable> . ] <replaceable>view_name</repl
          </para>
         </listitem>
        </varlistentry>
-      </variablelist></para>
+
+       <varlistentry>
+        <term><literal>security_invoker</literal> (<type>boolean</type>)</term>
+        <listitem>
+         <para>
+          If this option is set to <literal>true</literal>, it will cause all
+          access to underlying tables to be checked as referenced by the
+          invoking user, otherwise as the view owner (default).  See below for
+          implementation details and quirks.
+         </para>
+        </listitem>
+       </varlistentry>
+      </variablelist>
+
+      All of the above options can be changed on existing views using <link
+      linkend="sql-alterview"><command>ALTER VIEW</command></link>.
+     </para>
     </listitem>
    </varlistentry>
 
@@ -265,13 +279,42 @@ CREATE VIEW vista AS SELECT text 'Hello World' AS hello;
    </para>
 
    <para>
-    Access to tables referenced in the view is determined by permissions of
-    the view owner.  In some cases, this can be used to provide secure but
-    restricted access to the underlying tables.  However, not all views are
-    secure against tampering; see <xref linkend="rules-privileges"/> for
-    details.  Functions called in the view are treated the same as if they had
-    been called directly from the query using the view.  Therefore the user of
+    By default, access to relations referenced in the view is determined
+    by permissions of the view owner.  This can be used to provide secure
+    but restricted access to the underlying tables.  However, not all views
+    are secure against tampering; see <xref linkend="rules-privileges"/>
+    for details.
+   </para>
+
+   <para>
+    Functions called in the view are treated the same as if they had been
+    called directly from the query using the view.  Therefore, the user of
     a view must have permissions to call all functions used by the view.
+    This also means that functions are executed as the invoking user, not
+    the view owner.  In particular, <literal>CURRENT_USER</literal>
+    will always return the invoking user.  Note that
+    <literal>security_invoker</literal> set to <literal>false</literal>
+    is therefore <emphasis>not</emphasis> equivalent to
+    <literal>SECURITY DEFINER</literal> on functions and should not be confused.
+   </para>
+
+   <para>
+    If the <literal>security_invoker</literal> property is set to
+    <literal>true</literal> on a view, access to relations referenced in the
+    view is determined by permissions of the invoking user, rather than the
+    view owner.  If <link linkend="ddl-rowsecurity">row-level security</link>
+    is enabled on the referenced tables, policies are also invoked for the
+    invoking user.  This is useful if you want the view to behave just as if
+    the defining query had been used instead.
+   </para>
+
+   <para>
+    When creating (or replacing) a view, the user must have
+    <literal>CREATE</literal> privileges on the schema containing the view and
+    <literal>USAGE</literal> privileges on any schemas referred to in the view
+    query.  The view owner (or the invoking user if
+    <literal>security_invoker</literal> is set) only needs to have
+    <literal>USAGE</literal> privileges on the schema containing the view.
    </para>
 
    <para>
@@ -387,10 +430,17 @@ CREATE VIEW vista AS SELECT text 'Hello World' AS hello;
    <para>
     Note that the user performing the insert, update or delete on the view
     must have the corresponding insert, update or delete privilege on the
-    view.  In addition the view's owner must have the relevant privileges on
-    the underlying base relations, but the user performing the update does
-    not need any permissions on the underlying base relations (see
-    <xref linkend="rules-privileges"/>).
+    view.
+   </para>
+
+   <para>
+    Additionally, by default the view's owner must have the relevant privileges
+    on the underlying base relations, but the user performing the update does
+    not need any permissions on the underlying base relations. (see
+    <xref linkend="rules-privileges"/>)  If the view has the
+    <literal>security_invoker</literal> property is set to
+    <literal>true</literal>, the invoking user will need to have the relevant
+    privileges rather than the view owner.
    </para>
   </refsect2>
  </refsect1>
diff --git a/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c b/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c
index d592655258..599e160ca6 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c
@@ -140,6 +140,15 @@ static relopt_bool boolRelOpts[] =
 		},
 		false
 	},
+	{
+		{
+			"security_invoker",
+			"Privileges on underlying relations are checked as the invoking user, not the view owner",
+			RELOPT_KIND_VIEW,
+			AccessExclusiveLock
+		},
+		false
+	},
 	{
 		{
 			"vacuum_truncate",
@@ -1996,6 +2005,8 @@ view_reloptions(Datum reloptions, bool validate)
 	static const relopt_parse_elt tab[] = {
 		{"security_barrier", RELOPT_TYPE_BOOL,
 		offsetof(ViewOptions, security_barrier)},
+		{"security_invoker", RELOPT_TYPE_BOOL,
+		offsetof(ViewOptions, security_invoker)},
 		{"check_option", RELOPT_TYPE_ENUM,
 		offsetof(ViewOptions, check_option)}
 	};
diff --git a/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c b/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c
index 3d82138cb3..303195fea4 100644
--- a/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c
+++ b/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c
@@ -3242,18 +3242,24 @@ rewriteTargetView(Query *parsetree, Relation view)
 				   0);
 
 	/*
-	 * Mark the new target RTE for the permissions checks that we want to
-	 * enforce against the view owner, as distinct from the query caller.  At
-	 * the relation level, require the same INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE permissions
-	 * that the query caller needs against the view.  We drop the ACL_SELECT
-	 * bit that is presumably in new_rte->requiredPerms initially.
+	 * If the view has "security_invoker" set, mark the new target RTE
+	 * for the permissions checks that we want to enforce against the query
+	 * caller.  Otherwise we want to enforce them against the view owner.
+	 *
+	 * At the relation level, require the same INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE
+	 * permissions that the query caller needs against the view.  We drop the
+	 * ACL_SELECT bit that is presumably in new_rte->requiredPerms initially.
 	 *
 	 * Note: the original view RTE remains in the query's rangetable list.
 	 * Although it will be unused in the query plan, we need it there so that
 	 * the executor still performs appropriate permissions checks for the
 	 * query caller's use of the view.
 	 */
-	new_rte->checkAsUser = view->rd_rel->relowner;
+	if (RelationHasSecurityInvoker(view))
+		new_rte->checkAsUser = view_rte->checkAsUser;
+	else
+		new_rte->checkAsUser = view->rd_rel->relowner;
+
 	new_rte->requiredPerms = view_rte->requiredPerms;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c
index fccffce572..2bde343056 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c
@@ -826,11 +826,19 @@ RelationBuildRuleLock(Relation relation)
 		pfree(rule_str);
 
 		/*
-		 * We want the rule's table references to be checked as though by the
-		 * table owner, not the user referencing the rule.  Therefore, scan
-		 * through the rule's actions and set the checkAsUser field on all
-		 * rtable entries.  We have to look at the qual as well, in case it
-		 * contains sublinks.
+		 * If we're dealing with a view that has the "security_invoker" relopt
+		 * set to true, we want the rule's table references to be checked as
+		 * the user invoking the rule by setting the checkAsUser field to
+		 * "InvalidOid".
+		 * This also should only apply for SELECT statements, thus check for
+		 * that too. The view might have some non-SELECT rules created using
+		 * CREATE RULE, but their actions should be independent of the view
+		 * definition.
+		 *
+		 * In all other cases, we want the rule's table references to be
+		 * checked as though by the table owner.  Therefore, scan through the
+		 * rule's actions and set the checkAsUser field on all rtable entries.
+		 * We have to look at the qual as well, in case it contains sublinks.
 		 *
 		 * The reason for doing this when the rule is loaded, rather than when
 		 * it is stored, is that otherwise ALTER TABLE OWNER would have to
@@ -838,8 +846,18 @@ RelationBuildRuleLock(Relation relation)
 		 * the rule tree during load is relatively cheap (compared to
 		 * constructing it in the first place), so we do it here.
 		 */
-		setRuleCheckAsUser((Node *) rule->actions, relation->rd_rel->relowner);
-		setRuleCheckAsUser(rule->qual, relation->rd_rel->relowner);
+		if (rule->event == CMD_SELECT
+			&& relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_VIEW
+			&& RelationHasSecurityInvoker(relation))
+		{
+			setRuleCheckAsUser((Node *) rule->actions, InvalidOid);
+			setRuleCheckAsUser(rule->qual, InvalidOid);
+		}
+		else
+		{
+			setRuleCheckAsUser((Node *) rule->actions, relation->rd_rel->relowner);
+			setRuleCheckAsUser(rule->qual, relation->rd_rel->relowner);
+		}
 
 		if (numlocks >= maxlocks)
 		{
@@ -1164,27 +1182,6 @@ retry:
 	 */
 	RelationBuildTupleDesc(relation);
 
-	/*
-	 * Fetch rules and triggers that affect this relation
-	 */
-	if (relation->rd_rel->relhasrules)
-		RelationBuildRuleLock(relation);
-	else
-	{
-		relation->rd_rules = NULL;
-		relation->rd_rulescxt = NULL;
-	}
-
-	if (relation->rd_rel->relhastriggers)
-		RelationBuildTriggers(relation);
-	else
-		relation->trigdesc = NULL;
-
-	if (relation->rd_rel->relrowsecurity)
-		RelationBuildRowSecurity(relation);
-	else
-		relation->rd_rsdesc = NULL;
-
 	/* foreign key data is not loaded till asked for */
 	relation->rd_fkeylist = NIL;
 	relation->rd_fkeyvalid = false;
@@ -1213,9 +1210,33 @@ retry:
 	else
 		Assert(relation->rd_rel->relam == InvalidOid);
 
-	/* extract reloptions if any */
+	/*
+	 * Extract reloptions (if any) before fetching rules and triggers.
+	 * RelationBuildRuleLock() depends on having ->rd_options already set up.
+	 */
 	RelationParseRelOptions(relation, pg_class_tuple);
 
+	/*
+	 * Fetch rules and triggers that affect this relation
+	 */
+	if (relation->rd_rel->relhasrules)
+		RelationBuildRuleLock(relation);
+	else
+	{
+		relation->rd_rules = NULL;
+		relation->rd_rulescxt = NULL;
+	}
+
+	if (relation->rd_rel->relhastriggers)
+		RelationBuildTriggers(relation);
+	else
+		relation->trigdesc = NULL;
+
+	if (relation->rd_rel->relrowsecurity)
+		RelationBuildRowSecurity(relation);
+	else
+		relation->rd_rsdesc = NULL;
+
 	/*
 	 * initialize the relation lock manager information
 	 */
diff --git a/src/include/utils/rel.h b/src/include/utils/rel.h
index 3b4ab65ae2..67985e2ff8 100644
--- a/src/include/utils/rel.h
+++ b/src/include/utils/rel.h
@@ -398,6 +398,7 @@ typedef struct ViewOptions
 {
 	int32		vl_len_;		/* varlena header (do not touch directly!) */
 	bool		security_barrier;
+	bool		security_invoker;
 	ViewOptCheckOption check_option;
 } ViewOptions;
 
@@ -411,6 +412,16 @@ typedef struct ViewOptions
 	 (relation)->rd_options ?												\
 	  ((ViewOptions *) (relation)->rd_options)->security_barrier : false)
 
+/*
+ * RelationHasSecurityInvoker
+ *		Returns true if the relation has the security_invoker property set, or
+ *		not.  Note multiple eval of argument!
+ */
+#define RelationHasSecurityInvoker(relation)								\
+	(AssertMacro(relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_VIEW),				\
+	 (relation)->rd_options ?												\
+	  ((ViewOptions *) (relation)->rd_options)->security_invoker : false)
+
 /*
  * RelationHasCheckOption
  *		Returns true if the relation is a view defined with either the local
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/create_view.out b/src/test/regress/expected/create_view.out
index ae7c04353c..b2c28f9457 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/create_view.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/create_view.out
@@ -296,17 +296,31 @@ ERROR:  invalid value for boolean option "security_barrier": 100
 CREATE VIEW mysecview6 WITH (invalid_option)		-- Error
        AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a < 100;
 ERROR:  unrecognized parameter "invalid_option"
+CREATE VIEW mysecview7 WITH (security_invoker=true)
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a = 100;
+CREATE VIEW mysecview8 WITH (security_invoker=false, security_barrier=true)
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a > 100;
+CREATE VIEW mysecview9 WITH (security_invoker)
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a < 100;
+CREATE VIEW mysecview10 WITH (security_invoker=100)	-- Error
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a <> 100;
+ERROR:  invalid value for boolean option "security_invoker": 100
 SELECT relname, relkind, reloptions FROM pg_class
        WHERE oid in ('mysecview1'::regclass, 'mysecview2'::regclass,
-                     'mysecview3'::regclass, 'mysecview4'::regclass)
+                     'mysecview3'::regclass, 'mysecview4'::regclass,
+                     'mysecview7'::regclass, 'mysecview8'::regclass,
+                     'mysecview9'::regclass)
        ORDER BY relname;
-  relname   | relkind |        reloptions        
-------------+---------+--------------------------
+  relname   | relkind |                   reloptions                   
+------------+---------+------------------------------------------------
  mysecview1 | v       | 
  mysecview2 | v       | {security_barrier=true}
  mysecview3 | v       | {security_barrier=false}
  mysecview4 | v       | {security_barrier=true}
-(4 rows)
+ mysecview7 | v       | {security_invoker=true}
+ mysecview8 | v       | {security_invoker=false,security_barrier=true}
+ mysecview9 | v       | {security_invoker=true}
+(7 rows)
 
 CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW mysecview1
        AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a = 256;
@@ -316,18 +330,50 @@ CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW mysecview3 WITH (security_barrier=true)
        AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a < 256;
 CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW mysecview4 WITH (security_barrier=false)
        AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a <> 256;
+CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW mysecview7
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a > 256;
+CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW mysecview8 WITH (security_invoker=true)
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a < 256;
+CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW mysecview9 WITH (security_invoker=false, security_barrier=true)
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a <> 256;
 SELECT relname, relkind, reloptions FROM pg_class
        WHERE oid in ('mysecview1'::regclass, 'mysecview2'::regclass,
-                     'mysecview3'::regclass, 'mysecview4'::regclass)
+                     'mysecview3'::regclass, 'mysecview4'::regclass,
+                     'mysecview7'::regclass, 'mysecview8'::regclass,
+                     'mysecview9'::regclass)
        ORDER BY relname;
-  relname   | relkind |        reloptions        
-------------+---------+--------------------------
+  relname   | relkind |                   reloptions                   
+------------+---------+------------------------------------------------
  mysecview1 | v       | 
  mysecview2 | v       | 
  mysecview3 | v       | {security_barrier=true}
  mysecview4 | v       | {security_barrier=false}
-(4 rows)
-
+ mysecview7 | v       | 
+ mysecview8 | v       | {security_invoker=true}
+ mysecview9 | v       | {security_invoker=false,security_barrier=true}
+(7 rows)
+
+-- Test chained views when using security_invoker
+CREATE TABLE ct1 (x int);
+CREATE VIEW cv1 WITH (security_invoker=false) AS
+SELECT * FROM ct1;
+CREATE VIEW cv2 WITH (security_invoker=true) AS
+SELECT * FROM cv1;
+CREATE ROLE alice NOLOGIN;
+GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA testviewschm2 TO alice;
+GRANT SELECT ON cv1, cv2 TO alice;
+SET ROLE alice;
+SELECT * FROM cv2;
+ x 
+---
+(0 rows)
+
+RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
+REVOKE SELECT ON cv1 FROM alice;
+SET ROLE alice;
+SELECT * FROM cv2;
+ERROR:  permission denied for view cv1
+RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
 -- Check that unknown literals are converted to "text" in CREATE VIEW,
 -- so that we don't end up with unknown-type columns.
 CREATE VIEW unspecified_types AS
@@ -2039,7 +2085,7 @@ drop cascades to view aliased_view_2
 drop cascades to view aliased_view_3
 drop cascades to view aliased_view_4
 DROP SCHEMA testviewschm2 CASCADE;
-NOTICE:  drop cascades to 74 other objects
+NOTICE:  drop cascades to 80 other objects
 DETAIL:  drop cascades to table t1
 drop cascades to view temporal1
 drop cascades to view temporal2
@@ -2060,6 +2106,12 @@ drop cascades to view mysecview1
 drop cascades to view mysecview2
 drop cascades to view mysecview3
 drop cascades to view mysecview4
+drop cascades to view mysecview7
+drop cascades to view mysecview8
+drop cascades to view mysecview9
+drop cascades to table ct1
+drop cascades to view cv1
+drop cascades to view cv2
 drop cascades to view unspecified_types
 drop cascades to table tt1
 drop cascades to table tx1
@@ -2114,3 +2166,4 @@ drop cascades to view tt23v
 drop cascades to view tt24v
 drop cascades to view tt25v
 drop cascades to view tt26v
+DROP ROLE alice;
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/rowsecurity.out b/src/test/regress/expected/rowsecurity.out
index 89397e41f0..dec0ed5882 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/rowsecurity.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/rowsecurity.out
@@ -8,9 +8,11 @@ DROP USER IF EXISTS regress_rls_alice;
 DROP USER IF EXISTS regress_rls_bob;
 DROP USER IF EXISTS regress_rls_carol;
 DROP USER IF EXISTS regress_rls_dave;
+DROP USER IF EXISTS regress_rls_emily;
 DROP USER IF EXISTS regress_rls_exempt_user;
 DROP ROLE IF EXISTS regress_rls_group1;
 DROP ROLE IF EXISTS regress_rls_group2;
+DROP ROLE IF EXISTS regress_rls_group3;
 DROP SCHEMA IF EXISTS regress_rls_schema CASCADE;
 RESET client_min_messages;
 -- initial setup
@@ -18,11 +20,14 @@ CREATE USER regress_rls_alice NOLOGIN;
 CREATE USER regress_rls_bob NOLOGIN;
 CREATE USER regress_rls_carol NOLOGIN;
 CREATE USER regress_rls_dave NOLOGIN;
+CREATE USER regress_rls_emily NOLOGIN;
 CREATE USER regress_rls_exempt_user BYPASSRLS NOLOGIN;
 CREATE ROLE regress_rls_group1 NOLOGIN;
 CREATE ROLE regress_rls_group2 NOLOGIN;
+CREATE ROLE regress_rls_group3 NOLOGIN;
 GRANT regress_rls_group1 TO regress_rls_bob;
 GRANT regress_rls_group2 TO regress_rls_carol;
+GRANT regress_rls_group3 TO regress_rls_emily;
 CREATE SCHEMA regress_rls_schema;
 GRANT ALL ON SCHEMA regress_rls_schema to public;
 SET search_path = regress_rls_schema;
@@ -627,6 +632,39 @@ SELECT * FROM category;
   44 | manga
 (4 rows)
 
+-- Test views with security_invoker set
+RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
+SET row_security TO ON;
+CREATE POLICY p3 ON category FOR ALL TO regress_rls_group3 USING (cname = 'novel');
+CREATE VIEW v1 WITH (security_invoker=true) AS
+SELECT * FROM category;
+CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION security_invoker_func() RETURNS SETOF category
+    AS 'SELECT * FROM category'
+    LANGUAGE SQL STABLE STRICT;
+CREATE VIEW v1f WITH (security_invoker=true) AS
+SELECT * FROM security_invoker_func();
+GRANT SELECT ON category TO regress_rls_group3;
+GRANT SELECT ON v1 TO regress_rls_group3;
+GRANT SELECT ON v1f TO regress_rls_group3;
+SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regress_rls_emily;
+SELECT * FROM category;
+ cid | cname 
+-----+-------
+  11 | novel
+(1 row)
+
+SELECT * FROM v1;
+ cid | cname 
+-----+-------
+  11 | novel
+(1 row)
+
+SELECT * FROM v1f;
+ cid | cname 
+-----+-------
+  11 | novel
+(1 row)
+
 --
 -- Table inheritance and RLS policy
 --
@@ -3987,11 +4025,14 @@ RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
 --
 RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
 DROP SCHEMA regress_rls_schema CASCADE;
-NOTICE:  drop cascades to 29 other objects
+NOTICE:  drop cascades to 32 other objects
 DETAIL:  drop cascades to function f_leak(text)
 drop cascades to table uaccount
 drop cascades to table category
 drop cascades to table document
+drop cascades to view v1
+drop cascades to function security_invoker_func()
+drop cascades to view v1f
 drop cascades to table part_document
 drop cascades to table dependent
 drop cascades to table rec1
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/rules.out b/src/test/regress/expected/rules.out
index ac468568a1..cc95d1b267 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/rules.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/rules.out
@@ -2823,6 +2823,10 @@ select * from only t1_2;
 (10 rows)
 
 reset constraint_exclusion;
+drop table t1 cascade;
+NOTICE:  drop cascades to 2 other objects
+DETAIL:  drop cascades to table t1_1
+drop cascades to table t1_2
 -- test FOR UPDATE in rules
 create table rules_base(f1 int, f2 int);
 insert into rules_base values(1,2), (11,12);
@@ -3496,3 +3500,19 @@ SELECT * FROM ruletest2;
 
 DROP TABLE ruletest1;
 DROP TABLE ruletest2;
+-- Test rules on views with security_invoker set
+CREATE ROLE role1;
+CREATE TABLE t1 (x int);
+CREATE TABLE t2 (x int);
+CREATE VIEW v1 WITH (security_invoker=true) AS
+SELECT * FROM t1;
+GRANT INSERT ON t1, v1 TO role1;
+CREATE RULE testrule1 AS ON INSERT TO v1
+DO INSTEAD INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (NEW.*);
+SET ROLE role1;
+INSERT INTO v1 VALUES (1);
+RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
+DROP VIEW v1;
+DROP TABLE t2;
+DROP TABLE t1;
+DROP ROLE role1;
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/updatable_views.out b/src/test/regress/expected/updatable_views.out
index cdff914b93..622820047b 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/updatable_views.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/updatable_views.out
@@ -2578,6 +2578,34 @@ DROP VIEW v2;
 DROP VIEW v1;
 DROP TABLE t2;
 DROP TABLE t1;
+-- Check UPDATE/INSERT/DELETE on views with security_invoker set
+RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
+CREATE ROLE regress_role1;
+CREATE ROLE regress_role2;
+CREATE TABLE t1 (x int);
+CREATE VIEW v1 WITH (security_invoker=true) AS
+SELECT * FROM t1;
+ALTER VIEW v1 OWNER TO regress_role1;
+GRANT INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON t1 TO regress_role1;
+GRANT SELECT ON t1 TO regress_role2;
+GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON v1 TO regress_role2;
+SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regress_role2;
+SELECT * FROM v1;
+ x 
+---
+(0 rows)
+
+INSERT INTO v1 values (1);
+ERROR:  permission denied for table t1
+UPDATE v1 SET x = 2;
+ERROR:  permission denied for table t1
+DELETE FROM v1;
+ERROR:  permission denied for table t1
+RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
+DROP VIEW v1;
+DROP TABLE t1;
+DROP ROLE regress_role2;
+DROP ROLE regress_role1;
 --
 -- Test CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW turning a non-updatable view into an
 -- auto-updatable view and adding check options in a single step
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/create_view.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/create_view.sql
index 829f3ddbe6..84ca080ca9 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/create_view.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/create_view.sql
@@ -254,9 +254,19 @@ CREATE VIEW mysecview5 WITH (security_barrier=100)	-- Error
        AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a > 100;
 CREATE VIEW mysecview6 WITH (invalid_option)		-- Error
        AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a < 100;
+CREATE VIEW mysecview7 WITH (security_invoker=true)
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a = 100;
+CREATE VIEW mysecview8 WITH (security_invoker=false, security_barrier=true)
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a > 100;
+CREATE VIEW mysecview9 WITH (security_invoker)
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a < 100;
+CREATE VIEW mysecview10 WITH (security_invoker=100)	-- Error
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a <> 100;
 SELECT relname, relkind, reloptions FROM pg_class
        WHERE oid in ('mysecview1'::regclass, 'mysecview2'::regclass,
-                     'mysecview3'::regclass, 'mysecview4'::regclass)
+                     'mysecview3'::regclass, 'mysecview4'::regclass,
+                     'mysecview7'::regclass, 'mysecview8'::regclass,
+                     'mysecview9'::regclass)
        ORDER BY relname;
 
 CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW mysecview1
@@ -267,11 +277,40 @@ CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW mysecview3 WITH (security_barrier=true)
        AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a < 256;
 CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW mysecview4 WITH (security_barrier=false)
        AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a <> 256;
+CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW mysecview7
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a > 256;
+CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW mysecview8 WITH (security_invoker=true)
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a < 256;
+CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW mysecview9 WITH (security_invoker=false, security_barrier=true)
+       AS SELECT * FROM tbl1 WHERE a <> 256;
 SELECT relname, relkind, reloptions FROM pg_class
        WHERE oid in ('mysecview1'::regclass, 'mysecview2'::regclass,
-                     'mysecview3'::regclass, 'mysecview4'::regclass)
+                     'mysecview3'::regclass, 'mysecview4'::regclass,
+                     'mysecview7'::regclass, 'mysecview8'::regclass,
+                     'mysecview9'::regclass)
        ORDER BY relname;
 
+-- Test chained views when using security_invoker
+CREATE TABLE ct1 (x int);
+CREATE VIEW cv1 WITH (security_invoker=false) AS
+SELECT * FROM ct1;
+CREATE VIEW cv2 WITH (security_invoker=true) AS
+SELECT * FROM cv1;
+
+CREATE ROLE alice NOLOGIN;
+GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA testviewschm2 TO alice;
+GRANT SELECT ON cv1, cv2 TO alice;
+
+SET ROLE alice;
+SELECT * FROM cv2;
+
+RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
+REVOKE SELECT ON cv1 FROM alice;
+SET ROLE alice;
+SELECT * FROM cv2;
+
+RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
+
 -- Check that unknown literals are converted to "text" in CREATE VIEW,
 -- so that we don't end up with unknown-type columns.
 
@@ -722,3 +761,4 @@ select pg_get_viewdef('tt26v', true);
 -- clean up all the random objects we made above
 DROP SCHEMA temp_view_test CASCADE;
 DROP SCHEMA testviewschm2 CASCADE;
+DROP ROLE alice;
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/rowsecurity.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/rowsecurity.sql
index 44deb42bad..2e294cc775 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/rowsecurity.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/rowsecurity.sql
@@ -11,9 +11,11 @@ DROP USER IF EXISTS regress_rls_alice;
 DROP USER IF EXISTS regress_rls_bob;
 DROP USER IF EXISTS regress_rls_carol;
 DROP USER IF EXISTS regress_rls_dave;
+DROP USER IF EXISTS regress_rls_emily;
 DROP USER IF EXISTS regress_rls_exempt_user;
 DROP ROLE IF EXISTS regress_rls_group1;
 DROP ROLE IF EXISTS regress_rls_group2;
+DROP ROLE IF EXISTS regress_rls_group3;
 
 DROP SCHEMA IF EXISTS regress_rls_schema CASCADE;
 
@@ -24,12 +26,15 @@ CREATE USER regress_rls_alice NOLOGIN;
 CREATE USER regress_rls_bob NOLOGIN;
 CREATE USER regress_rls_carol NOLOGIN;
 CREATE USER regress_rls_dave NOLOGIN;
+CREATE USER regress_rls_emily NOLOGIN;
 CREATE USER regress_rls_exempt_user BYPASSRLS NOLOGIN;
 CREATE ROLE regress_rls_group1 NOLOGIN;
 CREATE ROLE regress_rls_group2 NOLOGIN;
+CREATE ROLE regress_rls_group3 NOLOGIN;
 
 GRANT regress_rls_group1 TO regress_rls_bob;
 GRANT regress_rls_group2 TO regress_rls_carol;
+GRANT regress_rls_group3 TO regress_rls_emily;
 
 CREATE SCHEMA regress_rls_schema;
 GRANT ALL ON SCHEMA regress_rls_schema to public;
@@ -225,6 +230,27 @@ SET row_security TO OFF;
 SELECT * FROM document;
 SELECT * FROM category;
 
+-- Test views with security_invoker set
+RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
+SET row_security TO ON;
+CREATE POLICY p3 ON category FOR ALL TO regress_rls_group3 USING (cname = 'novel');
+CREATE VIEW v1 WITH (security_invoker=true) AS
+SELECT * FROM category;
+CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION security_invoker_func() RETURNS SETOF category
+    AS 'SELECT * FROM category'
+    LANGUAGE SQL STABLE STRICT;
+CREATE VIEW v1f WITH (security_invoker=true) AS
+SELECT * FROM security_invoker_func();
+
+GRANT SELECT ON category TO regress_rls_group3;
+GRANT SELECT ON v1 TO regress_rls_group3;
+GRANT SELECT ON v1f TO regress_rls_group3;
+
+SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regress_rls_emily;
+SELECT * FROM category;
+SELECT * FROM v1;
+SELECT * FROM v1f;
+
 --
 -- Table inheritance and RLS policy
 --
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/rules.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/rules.sql
index 8bdab6dec3..d12e915107 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/rules.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/rules.sql
@@ -991,6 +991,7 @@ select * from only t1_1;
 select * from only t1_2;
 
 reset constraint_exclusion;
+drop table t1 cascade;
 
 -- test FOR UPDATE in rules
 
@@ -1257,3 +1258,25 @@ SELECT * FROM ruletest2;
 
 DROP TABLE ruletest1;
 DROP TABLE ruletest2;
+
+-- Test rules on views with security_invoker set
+CREATE ROLE role1;
+
+CREATE TABLE t1 (x int);
+CREATE TABLE t2 (x int);
+CREATE VIEW v1 WITH (security_invoker=true) AS
+SELECT * FROM t1;
+GRANT INSERT ON t1, v1 TO role1;
+
+CREATE RULE testrule1 AS ON INSERT TO v1
+DO INSTEAD INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (NEW.*);
+
+SET ROLE role1;
+
+INSERT INTO v1 VALUES (1);
+
+RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
+DROP VIEW v1;
+DROP TABLE t2;
+DROP TABLE t1;
+DROP ROLE role1;
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/updatable_views.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/updatable_views.sql
index 09328e582b..a00d5dabf7 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/updatable_views.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/updatable_views.sql
@@ -1226,6 +1226,33 @@ DROP VIEW v1;
 DROP TABLE t2;
 DROP TABLE t1;
 
+-- Check UPDATE/INSERT/DELETE on views with security_invoker set
+RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
+CREATE ROLE regress_role1;
+CREATE ROLE regress_role2;
+
+CREATE TABLE t1 (x int);
+CREATE VIEW v1 WITH (security_invoker=true) AS
+SELECT * FROM t1;
+ALTER VIEW v1 OWNER TO regress_role1;
+
+GRANT INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON t1 TO regress_role1;
+GRANT SELECT ON t1 TO regress_role2;
+GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON v1 TO regress_role2;
+
+SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regress_role2;
+
+SELECT * FROM v1;
+INSERT INTO v1 values (1);
+UPDATE v1 SET x = 2;
+DELETE FROM v1;
+
+RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
+DROP VIEW v1;
+DROP TABLE t1;
+DROP ROLE regress_role2;
+DROP ROLE regress_role1;
+
 --
 -- Test CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW turning a non-updatable view into an
 -- auto-updatable view and adding check options in a single step
-- 
2.35.1

Reply via email to