On Sat, Mar 05, 2022 at 04:54:18PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 05:05:32PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: >> Anyway, the only committer that showed some interest in the feature is >> Michael, >> and he seemed ok in principle with the "alias-implementation" approach. >> Michael, did you have a look at this version ([1]), or do you think it should >> simply be rejected? > > After a couple of months I see that there is unfortunately no agreement on > this > patch, or even its need.
I got a short look at what was proposed in the patch a couple of months ago, and still found the implementation confusing with the way aliases are handled, particularly when it came to several layers of pl/pgsql. I am fine to let it go for now. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
