Greetings, * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> writes: > > Any thoughts on back-patching at least the client portion of this? > > Probably hard to argue that it's a bug, but it is certainly painful. > > I'd be more eager to do that if we had some field complaints > about it. Since we don't, my inclination is not to, but I'm > only -0.1 or so; anybody else want to vote?
This patch was specifically developed in response to field complaints about it working differently, so there's that. Currently it's being worked around in the container environments by copying the key from the secret that's provided to a temporary space where we can modify the privileges, but that's pretty terrible. Would be great to be able to get rid of that in favor of being able to use it directly. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
