On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 01:09:53PM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote: > This one has been quiet for a while. Should we mark it as > returned-with-feedback?
Yes, that's my feeling and I got cold feet about this change. This patch would bring some extra visibility for something that's not incorrect either on HEAD, as end-of-recovery checkpoints are the same things as shutdown checkpoints. And there is an extra argument where back-patching would become a bit more tricky in an area that's already a lot sensitive. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
