Joseph Koshakow <kosh...@gmail.com> writes: > I do want to briefly mention, if I'm understanding the history of > EXTRACT correctly, that the previous behavior > actually was to multiply by 365.25, not 365. However The commit that > changed the return type from numeric [1] > changed that behavior. Looking through the discussions [2], I don't > see any mention of it, which makes me think > it was a mistake.
Indeed ... Peter? regards, tom lane