On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 1:03 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> On 2022/02/21 14:45, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 1:46 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> 
> > wrote:
> >> I reviewed 0001 patch. It looks good to me except the following minor 
> >> things. If these are addressed, I think that the 001 patch can be marked 
> >> as ready for committer.

> >> +        * Also determine to commit (sub)transactions opened on the remote 
> >> server
> >> +        * in parallel at (sub)transaction end.
> >>
> >> Like the comment "Determine whether to keep the connection ...", 
> >> "determine to commit" should be "determine whether to commit"?
> >
> > Agreed.  I’ll change it as such.

Done.

> Thanks! If that's updated, IMO it's ok to commit the 0001 patch.

Cool!  Attached is an updated patch.  Other changes other than that:
1) I added the curlevel parameter to
pgfdw_finish_pre_subcommit_cleanup() to avoid doing
GetCurrentTransactionNestLevel() there, as proposed, and 2) tweaked
comments a bit further, mostly for/in
pgfdw_finish_pre_commit_cleanup() and
pgfdw_finish_pre_subcommit_cleanup().  Barring objections, I’ll commit
the patch.

Thanks for reviewing!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

Attachment: v5-0001-postgres-fdw-Add-support-for-parallel-commit.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to