On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 9:37 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 2:19 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:18 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> >> > > The view name could be pg_stat_subscription_lrep, >> > > pg_stat_logical_replication, or something on those lines. >> > >> > pg_stat_subscription_stats :) >> > >> >> Having *stat* two times in the name sounds slightly odd to me but let >> us see what others think. One more option could be >> pg_stat_subscription_replication. >> > > Agreed. > > pg_stat_subscription_activity > > We already have pg_stat_activity (which may be an argument against the > suggestion...) >
I don't know if that can be an argument against it but one can imagine that we record other subscription changes like (change of publications, etc.). I personally feel it may be better to add '_replication' in some way like pg_stat_sub_replication_activity but I am fine either way. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
