On 20.02.22 01:39, Tom Lane wrote:
Hm, wouldn't it be less code to just use printf?Meh --- it'd be different from the way we do it in the rest of initdb, and it would not be "less code". Maybe it'd run a shade faster, but I refuse to believe that that'd be enough to matter.
There is a PG_CMD_PRINTF() that is used for that purpose.