On 20.02.22 01:39, Tom Lane wrote:
Hm, wouldn't it be less code to just use printf?
Meh --- it'd be different from the way we do it in the rest
of initdb, and it would not be "less code".  Maybe it'd run
a shade faster, but I refuse to believe that that'd be
enough to matter.

There is a PG_CMD_PRINTF() that is used for that purpose.


Reply via email to