On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 9:24 AM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 9:02 AM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Oh wait ... you want it the other way. Yeah, that seems harmless to > > change. I wonder how many others there are that could be changed > > similarly... > > I went through configure.ac looking for instances of > AC_CHECK_HEADERS() where the corresponding symbol was not used. I > found four: > > AC_CHECK_HEADERS(lz4.h, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([lz4.h header file is > required for LZ4])]) > AC_CHECK_HEADERS(gssapi/gssapi.h, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([gssapi.h header > file is required for GSSAPI])])]) > AC_CHECK_HEADERS(ldap.h, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([header file <ldap.h> is > required for LDAP])] > AC_CHECK_HEADER(winldap.h, [], ...stuff...) > > I guess we could clean all of those up similarly.
So here's a revised patch for zstd support that uses AC_CHECK_HEADER(), plus a second patch to change the occurrences above to use AC_CHECK_HEADER() and remove all traces of the corresponding preprocessor symbol. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v4-0001-Add-support-for-building-with-ZSTD.patch
Description: Binary data
v4-0002-Demote-AC_CHECK_HEADERS-calls-to-AC_CHECK_HEADER-.patch
Description: Binary data