On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:50 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On 16.02.22 06:00, Amul Sul wrote: > > Currently, numeric_pg_lsn is the only one that accepts the Numeric > > value and converts to uint64 and that is the reason all the type > > conversion code is embedded into it. > > There are other functions such as numeric_int8() that work similarly. > If you are going to refactor, then they should all be treated similarly. > I'm not sure if it's going to end up being beneficial.
Yeah, that's true, I am too not sure if we really need to refactor all those; If we want, I can give it a try. The intention here is to add a function that will convert numeric to uint64 -- we don't have any as of now, if I am not wrong. Regards, Amul
